CA-98 versus TA-65 and dosage for extending lifespan

Frederic asks how the product CA-98 (cycloastragenol) compares to TA-65.

The Wonders say both are valid but CA-98 is about 18% less effective, which matters if the goal is longevity.

Asked whether his current 8 mg of TA-65 is enough, they answer it depends on the objective: to gain a few years, stay at the current dose; to extend lifespan by another 60 to 100 years, double it.

When Frederic says his own psychologies would prevent a hundred extra years, they reply that the product itself is sufficient to extend the physical body - cells keep replicating and telomeres do not die off so quickly - and that although the mind does interfere, his psychologies of interference are shifting substantially and he is beginning to see the possibility as real, with probability being a matter of choice.